beta
Text
1. The defendant expresses his/her intention to transfer his/her claim listed in the separate sheet to ELto Co., Ltd.
Reasons
1. Facts of the dispute
A. The Plaintiff is an amount equivalent to KRW 41,80,000,000 for the said company and the amount equivalent to KRW 20% per annum from February 10, 2013 to the date of full payment, which is the legal dispute that is a party of ELto Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Doelto”). The Plaintiff is an amount equivalent to KRW 41,80,000 for the said company.
have a claim for the fees.
(This claim was confirmed by the judgment of Seoul Central District Court 2012dan273819). (B)
In the Seoul Southern District Court C real estate auction case, on May 27, 2015, the above court prepared a distribution schedule with the content of distributing KRW 99,016,852 in the Doelto, which is the right to collateral security (right to collateral security).
C. On May 12, 2015, based on the above judgment, the Plaintiff was issued an order of seizure and assignment of the claim against the dividend payment claim at Doelto under the Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2015TTT50286, which became final and conclusive.
C. On January 26, 2015, the Defendant received an order for seizure and assignment of the claim against the dividend payment claim based on a promissory note No. 150,000,000 won (a claim amount) against the Plaintiff’s earlier, the Defendant received an order for seizure and assignment of the claim against the dividend payment claim.
(Seoul Eastern District Court 2015TTTTTT 1368). 2. Determination as to the existence of loans and promissory notes claims asserted by the Defendant
A. The defendant's assertion asserts as follows that the defendant asserts the underlying claim, which is the basis of the Notarial Deed of the above Promissory Notes, as follows.
1) On November 4, 2011, the Defendant: (a) Doel Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Doel Construction”) at the bend bend bend bend station of the National Bank;
(2) On January 13, 2016, the Defendant issued a promissory note from ELto to secure the performance of the said loan claim against ELto the said case, with the aim of securing the performance of the said loan claim against ELto, and recognition of compulsory execution based on the said claim. The Defendant issued a promissory note from ELto.