A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From January 1, 2013, the Defendant is an operator of foul waste collection and transportation business of livestock excreta operating a limited company E (hereinafter referred to as the “consultative body of this case”) in Leecheon-si from around 1, 2013 to the present.

1. In Gyeonggi-do, in order to reduce the economic burden of a small livestock farm, the local government’s budget was instructed to subsidize expenses for the collection and transportation of livestock excreta in a small livestock farm, and in accordance with the above instruction, the victim Leecheon-si decided to subsidize expenses for the collection and transportation of livestock excreta in a small livestock farm in a small scale.

Therefore, even if the Defendant transported livestock excreta from livestock farmers other than the small-scale livestock farms designated in Ischeon-si, the Defendant was willing to acquire the money in the name of the subsidy from the victim Leecheon-si by submitting a false dynasium or receipt as if the Defendant collected and transported livestock excreta from the above designated livestock farmers.

On May 27, 2015, the Defendant: “Around May 27, 2015, the Defendant collected and transported livestock excreta in a total amount of KRW 3,577,730 kh from 3,57,000 to 3,577,730 knife livestock farmers designated by Ischeon-si from January 2015 to March 2015; and accordingly, the Defendant submitted an application for the payment of the subsidy for the collection and transportation of livestock excreta while making a false statement.

However, from January 2015 to March 2015, the defendant collected and transported livestock excreta from a small-scale livestock farm household designated by Leecheon-si from the victim Leecheon-si, which is equivalent to 1,488,810km. The substantial part of the defendant's statement and confirmation letter, which is the evidence submitted, was false.

In other words, from among documents submitted by the defendant, foul waste collection amounting to 2,088,920 kg is collected from a large livestock farm. Accordingly, the defendant has already been collected from the livestock farm.