1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 04:40 on May 12, 2014 to 08:10 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) at the victim D’s 607 room in Pyeongtaek-si from around 04:40 on May 12, 2014, at the victim D’s 607 room in Pyeongtaek-si; (b) without any justifiable reason, destroyed the fire-fighting equipment installed in the above gate; (c) cut off the fire-fighting equipment in the above gate; (d) with the operation of the fire alarm device, the strings in the string of the warning sound rapidly cut off the string time; and (e) interfered with the victim’s mother-child business by force, such as leaving the clothes in the 6th floor of the above her gate, leaving the string in the string and avoiding the disturbance.

2. On May 12, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, around 05:15, by assaulting the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning prevention, suppression, and investigation by assaulting, such as: (a) receiving reports on interference with business as described in paragraph (1); (b) receiving reports on interference with business as described in paragraph (1); and (c) receiving a disturbance from G from the police officer of the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station F District Unit of the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station; and (d) “police”; and (c) walking the bucks of the said G G on one occasion on one occasion; and (d) walking the bucks of the said G on one occasion on one occasion of drinking face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on images of the scene of damage, report on investigation (the testimony of witnesses related to the obstruction of performance of official duties), investigation report (CCTV investigation results), and CCTV image photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The confession of the crime of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is divided in the course of the crime of this case, the fact that at the time of the crime of this case, the defendant was suffering from the public disorder, there was no penalty power exceeding a fine once, there was only agreement with the victim of obstruction of business, and the victim made efforts to recover damage by depositing KRW 1.5 million for the victim police officers.