A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Csch Rexton car.

1. On December 11, 2012, the Defendant driving a car of approximately 410 meters at around 04:32, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by driving the car of approximately 0.138% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.138% from the road at the 413-6 Yung-dong Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul to the front of the road at the Yung-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul.

2. Around December 11, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicle) began two-lanes between the two-lanes from the direction of the sampling distance to the front of the Seoul Seongbuk-dong 413-16 Yingung-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, with driving the above vehicle at around 04:32.

On the road along which a median line is installed, there was a duty of care to operate safely on the right side of the median line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence of courseing the central line, caused the collision between the left-hand side of the victim D (the 43-year old) driving in the direction of the sampling distance from the Yeung-ro, which was driven by the victim D (the 43-year old) who driven the said taxi, and caused the victim D to suffer injury, such as climatic salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the victim F (the 31-year passenger of the said taxi), who is the passenger of the said taxi, sustained the injury of the climatic salt, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, and escaped from the scene without any justifiable reason without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim from the vehicle after stopping the vehicle.

3. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Inception measures) and the above 2.2. The Defendant escaped without taking necessary measures after destroying and damaging property equivalent to KRW 1,194,481 on the E-si owned by the Victim G G by means of a post-dlon exchange, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.F.