The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) sentenced by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case as committing the crimes of this case, and against his mistake, and that the defendant helps to lead a smooth marriage life for the remaining children living together or for the other children living together in order to not ignore their economic power, etc. from the remaining living together.

I think that each of the documents of this case was involved in the crime of this case

It is recognized that the thief committed the thief in this case for the purpose of preparing living expenses, and that the family members of the defendant want not to have good health status but want to take the defendant's preference.

However, in order to manage false statements about one's own respect or another's living together, the defendant has repeatedly interviewed a certificate of right to registration or a real estate lease agreement, which is a document proving a big and important legal relationship or fact-finding without any awareness of any particular crime. In light of the circumstances and methods of the crime, the crime is poor and its nature seems to require punishment corresponding thereto, and there is no agreement between the victim of the theft and the victim. In particular, the crime of forging and uttering of the official document of this case was committed after being sentenced to punishment due to fraud, etc., and the repeated crime was committed during the period of the repeated crime. In the case of the crime of forging and accompanying, the punishment of the sentence is more serious to the extent that the punishment of the defendant is to be sentenced to imprisonment, and there is no special reason to newly consider it after the sentence of the court below, and considering the age, character, environment, method and consequence of the crime, etc., the punishment of the defendant is too unfair after considering all the following factors.