The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A 4 years of imprisonment, Defendant B 3 years of imprisonment, and C 2 years and 6 months of imprisonment, respectively.

1. In full view of the summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts), the victim’s consistent statement, the hole created by the victim’s body, and the contents of text messages sent and received by the Defendants, the charges of this case can be found guilty.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged in this case is erroneous.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendants conspired to commit a crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special rape) by gathering the victim F (at the age of 17) to have sexual intercourse with the victim more drinking, and return to the victim; (b) remove the damaged person from the telecom and drink the victim more drinking on August 20, 2016; and (c) one of the Defendants B and C did not sell the victim later than 1 to the part of the victim’s fright and fright; (d) try to put the victim into the part of the victim’s fright to have sexual intercourse with the victim more than 0 fright, and (e) try to put the victim more than 6 fright at the part of the victim’s frightter; (e) attempt to put the victim into the part of the victim’s fright to have sexual intercourse with the victim more than 6 frightbuck, and (e) attempt to put the victim into the part of the victim’s fright.