logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.03.29 2017고단4046
무고
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) prepared a complaint stating that “In the office of a certified judicial scrivener with no knowledge of the name of 111,00,000 U.S. police station in front of the Busan, Busan, Busan, the 60 U.S. P. P., U.S. P., C and D, who borrowed KRW 70,000 from the complainant and could not be repaid in full; and (b) provided one of the high-frequency sexual organs as security, the Defendant incurred property damage by selling it at will to the deceased and wounded on December 31, 2016; and (c) submitted the above complaint to the public prosecutor’s office of U.S., U.S., the law of U.S. as of the same day.”

However, while the defendant urged the repayment of the obligation to C, it is difficult for the partner to dispose of the machinery and make it difficult for C to dispose of the machinery.

It is intended to make a transfer security contract and make a disposal on the basis of the transfer security contract and pay the debt.

“Around March 4, 2016, in response to the hearing of the horses, the preparation of a loan agreement for consumption of security deposits prior to installment payments was made. Around March 4, 2016, upon which C and machinery were disposed of to obtain debt repayment, and thus, C’s prior consent was found to have been made on the fact of the sale and purchase of machinery at the site of the sales contract after contact with E kept the machinery at the time, and confirmed the status of the sale and purchase of machinery at the site of the sales contract. Since C received a debt by remittance of KRW 25 million out of the purchase and sale of the machinery, it did not constitute a charge that C purchased and sold machinery in violation of the duty to keep the security after concluding a transfer security agreement.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, C and D, with the aim of having C and D receive criminal punishment, had C and D without prison labor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the authentic copy, a copy of a certificate of borrowing, a certificate of invalidation of borrowing, and a statement of account transactions;

1. Each of the relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts of crime;

arrow