Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, as to the defendant A and B, this paragraph shall apply.

Punishment of the crime

【Defendant A’s basic fact-finding number is a building-related worker, Defendant C is a person engaged in a heavy company, and Defendant B is a person who has been engaged in assisting in real estate brokerage in the public office of G certified broker office.

Defendant

A around October 2010, the injured party F (59) recommended the injured party F (59) to purchase forests and fields in which profits can be made by collecting soil and sand, etc. with the knowledge that the injured party F (59) would receive compensation for land expropriation, and then, the injured party F (59) knew that the injured party F (59) would be able to purchase forests and fields in which profits would be made available to the accused C, and the accused C made a request to inform the Defendant B of the forest and fields that

Accordingly, Defendant B around that time confirmed that approximately 130 million won and up to 150 million won in the prices from 10,000 to 150 million won in the forest of this case from around 28,428 square meters (hereinafter “the forest of this case”) via the living information site and a certified broker H, Defendant C was informed to Defendant C of the fact that the forest of this case was sold to Defendant C. Upon purchasing the forest of this case, Defendant C was able to gather and sell mushroom and matos and collect and sell matos, and Defendant A delivered talks to the victim with Defendant C, and the victim believed that the victim would be able to impose much money by purchasing the forest of this case. The victim believed that the forest of this case would be able to purchase the forest of this case and purchase the forest of this case.

【Inasmuch as the Defendants were not well aware of whether the forest of this case can be permitted to develop the forest of this case related to growing mushrooms or gathering marinas, the Defendants believed that the victims would be able to impose a lot of money with the permission to develop the forest of this case related to growing mushrooms or gathering marinas, and had the intent to purchase the forest of this case at a high price around the end of 2010.