logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.07.24 2013고단351
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:00 on March 14, 2013, the Defendant found Category D at the main point of “D” located in Sanyang-si, Sanyang-si, Sanyang-si, together with the victim E (the age of 40) and the victim F (the age of 52) for the purpose of calculating the drinking value after drinking alcohol, but was not found. As the victims mispercing that they stolen the Defendant’s wall, the victims would have stolen the Defendant’s wall, so that they click, which is a dangerous object on the table, cut back twice the victim’s right side, cut off two times the back water, and 3 glass cupped the victim E again, and continued to go to go to the victim F, followed the victim’s arms, which are dangerous objects, to defend them.

As a result, the defendant added the victim E with inside and outside of the treatment days, and assaulted the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the place of occurrence, image image printed materials, victim F image image printed materials, and victim E image printed materials;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes; Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of inflicting an injury on carrying a dangerous object); Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of assaulting carrying a dangerous object);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

arrow