All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below acquitted Defendant A and partially acquitted Defendant B of the charges of this case on the ground that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize it, although the Defendants conspired to deception victim F and deception a sum of KRW 44 million, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. On June 10, 201, the Defendants reported the victim F of the instant facts charged that “The victim F of the instant case, who was detained by the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office, provided the victim with information about other narcotics and provided a fine to be sentenced to a fine under the undetained state of G, and provided the victim with information about the crime to be sentenced to a fine.” However, even if the Defendants received money from the victim, they did not have the intent or ability to inform the victim of narcotics for G. The Defendants conspired with the victim, thereby deceiving the victim, and thereby deceiving the victim to receive KRW 10 million from the agricultural bank account in the name of H on June 10, 201, the victim could receive KRW 10 million from the said account on June 15, 201, and the victim could receive KRW 200,000,000,000 from the said account on June 15, 201 to the Defendant’s 30,016.

However, there is a problem.