The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment (one million won of fine) of the judgment of the court below is too unreasonable.

Considering the fact that the defendant is deemed to have no money from the time when he left the taxi operated by the victim B, and thus, is deemed to have no intent and ability to pay the taxi fee, the defendant did not respect the exercise of public authority by paying the taxi fee and soliciting him to return home at the police station district, but rather shows an attitude of disregarding and warning it, such as disregarding the exercise of public authority, such as giving the police officers, etc., and the statement to the effect that he would be retaliationed against the victim B at the police station district, the situation after the crime is not good, and the defendant has a lot of criminal history, and the defendant has a history of having been punished for the same crime, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, such as the method of the crime of this case, the background of the crime, the age and character and conduct of the defendant, etc., the defendant's argument is without merit

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.