1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A’s KRW 64,105,894 as well as its related KRW 5% per annum from February 28, 2014 to July 12, 2016, and July 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) In the event of a mutual aid accident, Defendant B, without qualification as a licensed real estate agent, arranged a sales contract to purchase D forest land 24,893 square meters and 24,893 square meters in Nam-si, Namyang-si, the Namyang-si, which was owned by Defendant A, with no qualification as a real estate agent, and was engaged in real estate brokerage business. However, at the time of the sales contract, the seller was the F who forged and presented C’s resident registration certificate, and the seller was to sell forest land at KRW 1 billion, and was sentenced to KRW 90,00,000 as down payment and intermediate payment from E, due to the above criminal facts, F was indicted under the name of a crime such as fabrication of public documents, and was sentenced to a conviction of imprisonment for one year and six months in the case of the Government District Court Decision 2009Da3001 decided December 16, 2009.

B. 1) After receiving a refund of KRW 20,00,000 from Defendant B, E filed a lawsuit against the Defendants claiming KRW 70,000,000 as compensation for damages arising from the tort. In the case of Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2010Da24425, Nov. 26, 2010, Defendant B did not confirm the owner, and Defendant B did not lend the certificate of qualification to Defendant B without qualification as licensed real estate agent, thereby recognizing the Defendants’ joint tort. Accordingly, the judgment of the Seoul Northern District Court concluded that Defendant B paid KRW 49,00,000 among the above money jointly and severally with Defendant B, and that Defendant B did not claim for a confession of the facts of Defendant E, and that Defendant B did not claim for a mutual aid project with Defendant B’s genuine liability for a limited amount of KRW 200,700,000,000, which was 2000.

(2).