(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.06.26 2014고정241

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.06.26 2014고정241

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 08:20 on September 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim D (here, 67 years of age) on the front side of Sejong C, on the ground that the victim D (here, f7 years of age) set away leaves and garbage to the victim's math, and placed the victim's right hand hand over the victim's right hand over; and (b) laid down the head at two times in the vicinity of Sejong C, the Defendant laid the victim's head in the inner part of the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Application of written confirmation of medical treatment, each photographic statute;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant asserts that there is no flusium when the victim was placed in the ancient zone and Gemansium, and that the victim of huhusium was a flusium and that the victim of husium was a flusium.

2. According to the above evidence, the victim is found to have suffered bodily injury on the day of the case, and the victim's consistent statement from the defendant that he suffered such bodily injury in response to this, the facts charged against the defendant are sufficiently recognized.

On the other hand, the Defendant, who was investigated by the investigative agency, stated as follows: “The victim was able to take advantage of the Gemanium, but the victim was not able to take away,” “the victim was able to die with the victim and boomed with one another at the elderly court,” and “the victim did not go against even though he was able to do so.” This appears to be a statement to the effect that even though the Defendant had been able to go against the victim, he did not cause any injury to the victim beyond the date. In light of this point, the Defendant’s vindication is believed as it is.

참조조문

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2016.02.03 2015노3367

-의정부지방법원 2015.06.02 2014고단4729

-서울북부지방법원 2014.12.05 2014고정2625

-대전지방법원 2014.11.12 2014노1892

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.11.17 2017고단501