The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months) of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment appears to have led to the confession of all of the crimes in this case and against his mistake. The frequency of the crimes in this case is relatively minor, and the crime in this case is relatively minor, but the defendant had a record of criminal punishment over 18 times in the same kind of crime, including several times of punishment, but the execution of the punishment in this case has been completed and only about 4 months have passed again. The crime in violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act is highly necessary since it may impair society and the state's soundness due to its toxicity. In addition, there is a need for strict punishment since the crime in violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act may injure society and the state's soundness due to its toxicity. Furthermore, there are various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines set by the Sentencing of the Sentencing Committee, and there is no other reason that the court below is deemed to have exceeded the reasonable limit of discretion in sentencing determination, and the defendant's assertion in this case is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.