The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal - The sentence of an unreasonable sentencing (eight years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case was committed on the basis of the defendant's economic issues, such as his/her obligation, and the fact that the defendant was living separately with his/her husband, and then the victim D (son, 7 years old) died and the victim E (the victim E) was injured. Although the defendant was responsible for raising victims healthy as his/her mother, it is too serious that the result of the crime was committed against humanity, such as preventing the victim from committing a crime against humanity, and the victim D's death. Since human life is the most respected value that should be protected by the State or society, it cannot be used for any reason, and it was inevitable to murder his/her children because he/she committed suicide or attempted suicide with his/her own life, and attempted to murder his/her children because he/she did not have been living properly due to his/her husband's awareness that it was caused by an unlawful perception that his/her child was his/her own property, and thus, the defendant's obligation to kill him/her for any reason corresponding to his/her husband's liability is determined and unreasonable.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and the defendant attempted to live together with the victims, and even though it did not reach the death, the sale and the bridge were hard to reach the death.