The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal was that the Defendant parked in a place where parking was prohibited.

Even if this is, it is only parked while reporting to 112 and explaining the situation to the police officer dispatched to request the crackdown on the street, and it constitutes a justifiable act that does not go against the social rules.

As such, the judgment of the court below which convicted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as to legitimate acts.

2. The term "act that does not contravene social rules and judgment" refers to an act that is extremely normal in the form of a living, which is within the scope of historical social order created. Although in this case, there are such circumstances as claimed by the defendant, as claimed by the defendant.

Even if parking is parked in a place where parking is prohibited, it cannot be deemed that it does not go against the social norms, and the record also recognizes that the defendant continued parking in the same place without a police officer's request for parking lot dispatched. The above act is an act contrary to the social norms, so the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.