1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning for the statement concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In full view of the evidence Nos. 5 and 13-14 of the second 13-14, the phrase “A” was written by taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in the respective statements set forth in evidence Nos. 8, 4, and 5 of A, the phrase “National Bank” of the first 16 was written by either “one Bank” of “6,010,404 won” and “5,280,004 won” of the last 16.

Part 3 of Part 4 of the third side shall be used " to the Switzerland friendly Gu" as "the Switzerland friendly Gu (the date of pleading at the trial of the court)" and shall be deleted as "the reference material" in Part 9.

B. The grounds alleged by the Defendant in the appeal do not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance court. Since the permission for extension of the period of stay for a foreigner has the nature of a kind of permanent disposition that grants the applicant the right to continue to stay in Korea, the permission-granting authority has discretion to decide whether to grant permission, taking into account the applicant’s eligibility, purpose of stay, influence on the public interest, etc., and even if considering that it is reasonable to request the applicant for the permission for extension of the period of stay from the Defendant who is obliged to operate immigration control administration in accordance with the consistent criteria to submit the objective data as much as possible, it is reasonable to consider the aforementioned circumstances, taking into account the following circumstances, the fact-finding and decision at the first instance court is justifiable, taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings as a whole.

On April 13, 2017, the Plaintiff deposited approximately KRW 10,000 won in the instant account (which was opened on April 27, 2016) with a total of approximately KRW 10,000 won over the pre-written draft of submission of the certificate of balance.