logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.05 2017가합570123
직무발명보상금 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A KRW 51,146,981, KRW 72,70,751, and KRW 83,671,698 and each of them.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 28, 2010, Nonparty F Co., Ltd. was divided and merged with Nonparty G Co., Ltd. on June 28, 2010. G Co., Ltd. changed its mission to D by absorbing Nonparty Co., Ltd. on April 1, 2014. D Co., Ltd. on March 15, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) or “Defendant Co., Ltd.” in total.

(2) Plaintiff C was merged with each other. (2) From December 2009 to August 201, 201; Plaintiff A from October 2001 to June 201; Plaintiff B from July 201 to January 201, and Plaintiff B from July 2010 to January 2016.

3) The Defendant Company is a corporation that engages in civil engineering and construction works. B. The main provisions related to the instant case in the provisions on the Defendant’s employee’s invention compensation regulations for the FF Company’s employee’s invention compensation regulations (attached Form 1) concerning the Defendant’s employee’s invention compensation regulations (hereinafter “instant compensation regulations”).

(C) The Plaintiffs’ invention is an employee invention indicated in the employee invention list (attached Form 2) (hereinafter referred to as “employee invention in this case”) while in office in the Defendant company, and an individual invention is referred to as the sequence attached thereto, notwithstanding the merger, merger, and merger of the Defendant company.

(D) The Defendant completed the work compensation obligation of the Plaintiffs following the merger by division and merger of the Defendant Company, and the Defendant finally accepted the Defendant’s duty compensation obligation of the Plaintiffs. D) The Defendant granted to another company or company the non-exclusive license of the Plaintiff C and Nonparty H, the inventor, for the instant work invention Nos. 10, 13 (hereinafter “instant work invention”) and the Plaintiffs and Non-Party H, the inventor, and for the instant work invention Nos. 16, 35, 38, 39 (hereinafter “instant work invention”).

2 The defendant grants a non-exclusive license on each of the above methods of construction as above.

arrow