logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.10.10 2017고단2675
사기
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant in the facts charged is a person engaged in the sale and brokerage of fishery products while operating “C” and “D”, and the complainant B is a person who was aware of the Defendant while operating “E” and constructing a factory of the Defendant.

From March 27, 2015, the Defendant continued to borrow and repay money from the complainant to June 2016 under the pretext of short-term borrowing from the complainants from the time to June 2016. From that time, the Defendant borrowed a total of KRW 300 million from the complainants over several occasions, and again, the Defendant borrowed a total of KRW 300 million from the complainants over several occasions, and then, the Defendant decided to pay the complainants the principal amount of KRW 300 million with the proceeds from the purchase of raps sold in the winter and the proceeds therefrom.

Accordingly, the Defendant, around June 2016, conducted as if the complainants in Busan Hho-gu, operated by the above construction company office, could bring high profits through the sale of crap, and the Defendant, upon purchasing the crap source with a total of KRW 300 million from October 2016 to March 2017, the Defendant would sell crap through Home shopping and sell the crap with a total of KRW 300 million from October 2016 to March 2017.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, from around 2015, the Defendant continued to be equipped with the sales channels of crap since around 2015 due to the aggravation of climate and the omission of home shopping channel programming, and the Defendant was in a very worse situation, such as repayment by preventing repayment from returning the previous loan borrowed loan borrowed from the borrower and the complainant.

In addition, even if the defendant receives money from the complainant, he thought that it will be used to pay the personal debt of the defendant and the previous credit payment.

arrow