1. The defendant's delivery of real estate stated in the separate sheet Nos. 2 and 3 from the plaintiff at the same time 86,000.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. Facts 1) Real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) that was originally owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant real estate”), and where part of the real estate is specified, “the instant real estate” by the sequence thereof.

(2) On May 11, 2009, the Plaintiff sold the instant real estate at KRW 400,000 between the Defendant and the Defendant for KRW 100,000,000,000 to secure the Defendant’s loan obligation of KRW 100,000,000 to the Defendant, and the remaining KRW 300,00,000,000,000 was substituted for the repayment of the Defendant’s loan obligation of KRW 100,000 to the Defendant, and the Defendant acquired the ownership transfer registration of the instant real estate with the Defendant for KRW 214,00,000,00 as collateral obligation guaranteed by the Defendant and new bank as collateral, and the Defendant acquired the ownership transfer registration of the instant real estate with respect to KRW 20,00,00 as collateral obligation of KRW 214,00,00 and KRW 25,000 as collateral obligation of KRW 14,00,000.

3) After that, on October 27, 2010, the Defendant entered the secured obligation which is secured by the said right of collateral between the new bank and the new bank, a stock company, in its entirety, the principal of the obligation is KRW 188,00,000.

(4) On the other hand, the obligation to return the lease deposit on the instant real estate paragraph (3) of this case is currently nonexistent upon the Plaintiff’s repayment of all of its obligation. In addition, the obligation to return the lease deposit on the instant real estate paragraph (3) of this case is currently nonexistent.

【No dispute over the basis of recognition】No dispute over the facts, Gap evidence 1 through 8 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1, and the plaintiff's question.