Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A A is the owner of a lease contract to rent KRW 10 million monthly rent of KRW 10,000 and KRW 10,000,000,000 for around April 2015. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in the business of installing a card terminal in the name of "G" in the name of "G" in the name of "G" in accordance with Article 201 of the members of Ansan-si.

Defendant

A The following year after the lease of a commercial building in the above D D D Building and the installation of a interior room for operation as an entertainment store:

8.1. On the 25th of the same month, H entered into a sublease contract to sublet the above commercial building to KRW 20 million, monthly rent of KRW 27 million, and KRW 2.7 million. On the 25th of the same month, H opened and operated the above commercial building with the trade name of “I” in the above commercial building and opened the entertainment center, and on the grounds of the defect of the construction, H demanded Defendant A to terminate the contract and return the deposit, and Defendant A demanded H to pay monthly rent and management expenses, etc., and caused disputes between them.

Defendant

A continues the situation where H ceases to operate and continue to occupy the commercial building without resolving these problems. On the other hand, as the termination of the contract term of the commercial building lease it entered into with E, A was introduced by the Defendant B to assist the Plaintiff to transfer his business to a third party through his awareness of intent to transfer his business to a third party.

Accordingly, the Defendants prepared relevant documents as if Defendant A had a copy of the lease agreement and resident registration certificate of H transfer of the I’s operating license under the name of J, which is the seat of Defendant B, to the competent authority, and Defendant A conspired to pay the consideration to Defendant B.

1. The Defendants forged private documents within the above “G office” office around December 2, 2016, and Defendant B’s business succession report, transfer certificate, power of attorney (for succession to the status), and closing report.