logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.09.24 2015고단2749
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 25, 2015, at around 01:45, the Defendant: (a) received a report on the fact that the taxi cost was in the front door of Puan apartment apartment 11-ro 8-ro, Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, by entering the taxi vehicle number in the taxi pocket book, and subsequently, committed assault, such as flabing the feb of the said D, and threatening as being drinking, under the influence of alcohol, when entering the taxi vehicle number in the taxi pocket book, the Defendant used it.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of police officers' crimes and the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment, etc. of photographs);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution) has no basic area (Article 6-1 and 4 months) (Article 6-1 of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties) [Determination of Sentence] [Article 4(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution] (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Performance of Official Duties] (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the criminal act in this case was committed in light of the circumstances leading to the crime in this case, degree of damage, and the defendant

arrow