A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 29, 2014, around 23:40, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender on suspicion of assaulting a taxi driver; and (b) was going to the Seoul Dispatching Police Station on the 112 patrol vehicle; (c) the Defendant her head part of the police box belonging to the above police box, which kept his custody, was 3 times on the floor of his hand; and (d) committed assault by promptly asking the left part of the elel.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer on the safe guard of the arrested person, and at the same time, the victim F (the age of 28) was put on an open top of the supervising division in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the injured party photograph and diagnostic certificate;

1. Articles 257 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6-1-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the person who has been specially punished] [decision of sentence] The crime of this case is disadvantageous to the fact that the defendant was punished several times as a fine for the crime of past violence, etc.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and divided the defendant, and that the defendant deposited 2 million won for the police officer who is the victim is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, occupation, etc., shall be determined as the disposition.