logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.29 2017고정2921
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Resident Registration Act;

A. On February 17, 2016, the Defendant entered the personal information and resident registration numbers of B of the middle school that was connected on the website of the cards, and then illegally used B’s resident registration numbers by obtaining one copy of the cards by issuing B’s resident registration number and personal information as if he/she was B, to verify himself/herself.

B. On the 25th day of the same month, the Defendant entered B’s personal information and resident registration numbers by the following means, and illegally used B’s resident registration numbers by issuing one copy of the card (D).

(c)

On March 21, 2016, the Defendant entered B’s personal information and resident registration number in connection with SBI’s website and came to know in advance while using B’s cellular phone.

B In order to enter the password of the official stamp, B obtained a loan through identification, and illegally used B's resident registration number.

2. On February 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) obtained one card from E, one card employee, and then signed B on the date of receipt of the “certificate of application for issuance and receipt” column for “B” and “B” column for consent to the receipt and use of personal information.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a certificate of application for issuance of one card and a certificate of acceptance under the name of private document B, which is a private document related to fact verification.

3. The Defendant, as stated in paragraph 2, issued the certificate of application for issuance and receipt of one card, which was forged, and exercised it to E, one card employee who may know of the fact that the completion of the certificate was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow