1. The Plaintiff:

A. As from December 24, 2014, Defendant B: 12,000 won and its related thereto:

B. Defendant D shall pay KRW 2,00,611 as well as this.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 1, 2014, the Plaintiff misrepresented that he/she is an investigator of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office, and, “In order to prevent any damage caused by leakage of information, it is required to cooperate with him/her.” The Plaintiff entered account-related information, such as the bank account in the name of the Plaintiff and the bank account number, bank account transfer number, and security card number.”

B. Afterwards, the Defendants, using the Plaintiff’s personal information, acquired the sum of KRW 48,98,500 (total KRW 54,998,500, which was the sum of KRW 54,998,500) from each of the Defendants’ respective accounts under the Plaintiff’s name as follows.

On July 1, 2014, 15:04, 4,98,50 won in the account number of the temporary deposit account financial institution B B B on July 1, 2014, J 17:02 6,000,000 won in the future C on July 1, 2014, “K 3” [6,000,000,000 won in the Hyundai Securities L 4: 6,00,00,000 won in the aggregate “6,00,00,000,000 won in the E-Investment Securities N6,6,00,000 won in the aggregate “10,000,000,000 won in the 30,000,000 won in the 17:6,00,000,000 won in the new Securities Co., Ltd., Ltd. [1, 90,010,000 won in the future Securities Co.

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant G and H

A. Although the money remitted from the account in the Plaintiff’s name to the account in the name of Defendant G and H does not exist any legal relationship causing account transfer, the said Defendants made unjust enrichment by acquiring a deposit claim equivalent to the amount transferred by the said Defendants.