Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant C’s obstruction of business from April 28, 2017 to November 11:40, 2017, on the ground that: (a) at the site of the removal of parking facilities of the E Center located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju; (b) the head of the management office of the relevant E Center removed parking facilities and did not give any consultation to the right holder on the removal of parking facilities; and (c) Defendant F prevented the access to the construction site to a passenger car and the said F F from removing the parking facilities in his/her capacity.

Doz. Doz.

Whether or not a person is subject to marity

“Along with sound,” the construction of approximately 40 minutes was obstructed.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the removal work of the victim by force.

2. The Defendants’ interference with the Defendants’ work from April 28, 2017 to April 13:30, 2017, on the same grounds as the indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1 at the same place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, and on the same grounds as the indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, to the victim F.

Whether the parking section is not removed, and the fixed facilities are removed.

Whenever the removal is made in mind

Defendant A and Defendant C interfered with approximately 30 minutes of construction by blocking the front of the digging season.

As a result, the Defendants interfered with the victim's removal work by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the first public trial protocol

1. Statement in F in the second public trial records, and statement statement in G in the fourth public trial records (including net 15 times and accompanying documents);

1. Responses to requests for cooperation in investigation (net 5);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph (for a time, 6-1);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

(a) Defendant C: Article 314(1) (a) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business affairs due to illegal stopping through entry) and Articles 314(1) and 30 (the point of interference with business affairs due to interference with cutting off operations);

B. Defendant A and B: Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 37 and 38 of the Criminal Act apply to Defendant C, not Defendant C, by the law applicable to Defendant C.