logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.11.14 2013고합405
살인
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for fifteen years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around June 8, 2012, entered the D coffee shop located in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Seoul Metropolitan City C market, discovered the victim E (the 66-year old age) who was mixed and accessed his female. On the other hand, the Defendant heard from the victim that he purchased a house without permission from the Gyeonggi-do Pyeongtaek-do Lan-do Lan-do, but did not fully pay the loan, and helps to sell the above house, and helps the victim purchase and sell the above house and receive the fee, and helps the victim purchase and sell real estate and repair the building, and helps the victim purchase and sell the house.

Afterward, the Defendant, on behalf of the victim, placed the victim in a large number of real estate brokerage offices in order to sell an unauthorized house owned by the victim of Pyeongtaek-si in Gyeonggi-do on behalf of the victim. On the other hand, the victim was paid in an internal relationship with the victim rapidly, and the victim was able to sell the above house around June 28, 2013.

On August 19, 2013, at around 08:00, the Defendant sent the victim to a nearby coffee shop in order to pay capital gains tax on the sale and purchase of the above house. At around 08:00, the Defendant went to a public announcement source where the Defendant living in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, and then put the transition ( approximately 23cm in total length, approximately 13cm in blade) that was located in a place where waste disposal was located rapidly near, and then put the victim into a bank, at around 08:40 on the same day, and then completed the report of capital gains tax and then moved the victim to a nearby coffee shop in Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government at around 08:40 on the same day. However, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the demand of the victim to take into account his well-known and consider, but the Defendant was frequently dissatisfied with the demand of the victim to move the victim within his own coffee shop.

arrow