A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 22:50, in the guard room of the Busan-gu Busan-gu C building B, Busan-do, and (b) on the ground that the Defendant did not provide economic assistance to the Defendant, by blocking all contact with the Defendant, the Defendant: (c) called “Isle, dead, or dead, dead, or dead, all times,” and (d) the victim as “Is the victim with a dangerous thing (10 centimeters in blade length) and tried to injure the victim; (d) tried to see the victim’s body, and (e) tried to injure the victim’s upper part of the victim’s upper part of the body, and (e) tried to far the victim’s upper part of the victim’s left part of the treatment days, and far the victim’s upper part of the victim’s left part of the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Medical certificates and death certificates;

1. A report on emergency measures, a criminal tool, a photograph of damage, CCTV-cape photographs, and CCTV-cape images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (investigation, etc. into emergency seizure) and investigation reports (in cases of attachment of a medical certificate of injury), and statutes;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution (The following factors are repeated as stated in the grounds for sentencing)

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is deeply divided in depth; (b) the Defendant’s mother’s mother wants to take the Defendant’s wife against the Defendant when the Defendant was in the court of the first instance; (c) the Defendant has been punished several times by a fine, but there has been no history of having been sentenced to imprisonment or heavier punishment; and (d) the Defendant’s age, health status, etc. is considered as the disposition of the sentence.