(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.01.23 2018고단2189

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.01.23 2018고단2189

야간건조물침입절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 15, 2018, around 20:25, the Defendant: (a) invadedd the convenience store through the entrance in which the victim C, who was located in the Hanam-si B, used a cresh in which surveillance by the victim was neglected; and (b) invaded the victim’s cresh by using the entrance in which the victim’s think of theft was opened; and (c) 2,800 won of the market price managed by the victim, which was located in the display belt, was concealed into the part of the Defendant.

2. A thief and the Defendant: (a) around 05:56, July 18, 2018, at the G convenience point where the victim F was working in Hanam-si, Hanam-si, the victim F was invaded on the said convenience point through the entrance open in which he thought that the victim’s surveillance was neglected by using the gaps; (b) the victim’s intrusion on the said convenience point; and (c) by taking away the victim’s 2,800 won in the market price managed by the victim located in the display belt, the victim was discovered of the victim and did not bring about the victim’s attempted intention.

3. From August 12, 2018, around 08:10 on August 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) invaded on the convenience store through the entrance open to the victim’s mind that the victim’s surveillance was neglected by using the gap; and (b) caused the victim’s intrusion into the convenience store by taking off one of the 2,800 won of the market price managed by the victim located in the display stand.

4. On August 15, 2018, around 16:29, the Defendant was at the same place as the above Paragraph 3 of the same Article, and the Defendant abused the convenience store under the above Paragraph 3 through a entrance open to the victim’s think of theft by using the gaps of supervision over the victim, such as Paragraph 3 of the same Article, and then stolen the victim’s 2,800 won of the market price managed by the victim located in the display belt.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of K, F, and I;

1. CCTV-cap photographs and video CDs for committing the crime;

1. Application of the CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes 1.0

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2019.07.03 2018고단3348

-서울남부지방법원 2019.01.23 2018고단4800

-춘천지방법원 원주지원 2019.06.07 2019고정72

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.11.11 2015고단1392

-수원지방법원 여주지원 2013.07.05 2013고단373