logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.11.11 2015고단2178
공용물건손상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 5, 2015, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) was urged by the police officer to return home to the scene because he had no reporter’s intent to punish the reporter; (b) on June 5, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of the Seoul Northernbuk-gu C; and (c) on June 112, 2015, the Defendant was urged to return home from the circumstances where the D Zone was affiliated with the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station;

1. On June 5, 2015, at around 23:20 on June 5, 2015, the Defendant damaged public objects and walked with the d district zone located in F in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with a view to walking the d district entrance door, the two doors of the vehicle, the entrance door, and the door of the d district door, the door of which is closed properly.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the entrance door, which is an object used by public offices, to be equivalent to KRW 165,00 in repairing cost.

2. The Defendant, as described in paragraph (1) at the date and time, at the place of the obstruction of performance of official duties, borrowed the entrance door from the front door to the G in the circumstances where the said zone zone belongs to the Defendant, booms the body of the above G on two occasions on the line, and booms the tobacco, notwithstanding the control of the above G, the Defendant sing down the body of the above G as “Ye, grack knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick knick kk

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the above G and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of police officers' crimes and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of the written estimate of damage to the current state of the D Zone and the estimated cost of repair;

1. Relevant Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are examined.

arrow