logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.11.22 2019고단4884
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 14,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2015, the defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Sung-nam branch of Suwon District Court on April 12, 2015.

피고인은 2019. 7. 31. 01:03경 B 포드 익스플로러 승용차를 운전하여 용인시 수지구 C 아파트 D동 지하주차장 내부로 진행한 후, 위 지하주차장 내에서 ‘B 포드 익스플로러 승용차가 백현지하차도를 지나 비틀거리며 운행되고 있어 음주운전이 의심된다’라는 취지의 신고를 받고 출동한 경기용인서부경찰서 소속 순경 E과 순경 F으로부터 당시 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 나고 얼굴이 붉게 상기되어 있으며 음주감지기로 음주 상태임이 감지되는 등 술에 취한 상태로 운전하였다고 인정할만한 상당한 이유가 있어 같은 날 01:40경까지 총 4회에 걸쳐 음주측정요구를 받았음에도 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 음주측정요구에 정당한 사유 없이 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation reports and investigation reports (report on the examination of screen pictures taken by police officers visiting the site);

1. A detailed statement on handling 112 reported cases;

1. The circumstantial statement statement and investigation report of the employer (the circumstantial report of the employer-employed driver);

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of criminal records of the same kind as a suspect);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of the provisional payment order is that the defendant who has a record of driving alcohol and has driven alcohol while drinking alcohol does not respond to the measurement of drinking alcohol by police officers, and the nature of the crime is

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, and the defendant was above once.

arrow