logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.27 2016가단71226
건물명도 등
Text

1. Defendant B shall deliver to Defendant SP the real estate listed in the separate sheet to Defendant SP.

2. Defendant.

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 through 5, B, and 1, Defendant B leased real estate indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) from Defendant E.S. and renewed the lease on a two-year basis with Defendant E.S. on January 11, 2016, the lease contract was concluded between 10,580,000, monthly rent of 136,000, monthly rent of 136,000, and interest rate of 130.31 December 31, 2017. ② The Plaintiff filed a loan lawsuit against the Defendant B with Seoul Central District Court Decision 2008Da609, Jul. 11, 2008, with Defendant E. 208, and the judgment of the court rendered a collection order from 000,000 won to 30,000 won, with Defendant E.S.’s annual interest rate of 60,78.206, respectively.

According to the above facts, the lease contract on the real estate of this case, which existed between the Defendants at the time of issuing the seizure and collection order of this case, was terminated upon the lapse of two years from the term of lease stipulated in the contract. After Defendant E&S received the delivery of the seizure and collection order of this case, the lease contract was renewed between the Defendants.

arrow