1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant (appointed party) and the appointed party is all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. A summary of a land readjustment project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Determination and public notice of an urban planning project zone on July 3, 1998: F of Incheon Metropolitan City public notice - on July 13, 2002: Authorization of a land substitution plan on December 27, 2004: public notice of Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City public notice of Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City - authorization of the establishment of an association (change) and authorization of a project implementation (change) on May 29, 2007: Public notice I - authorization of a land substitution plan (change) and a land substitution plan (change) on October 4, 201, not a replotting disposition.

Notice: J-Public Notice of Incheon Metropolitan City - Public notice of a replotting disposition on October 24, 201 (hereinafter “instant replotting disposition”).

B. (1) The Plaintiff was a cooperative that received project authorization as above by the former Land Readjustment Project Act (repealed by Act No. 6252, Jul. 1, 2000; hereinafter the same) and the network K (hereinafter “the network”) owned 1/2 shares of Jung-gu Incheon Ldo 251m2 (hereinafter “Before land substitution”) as the Plaintiff’s members, but died on December 25, 2006.

(2) However, the instant disposition of replotting was taken with respect to the land before replotting and 145 square meters of land prior to replotting (hereinafter “land after replotting”). On March 29, 2017, the Plaintiff had the ownership transfer registration for shares of 56.9/274.3 square meters of land after replotting under the name of the Deceased.

(3) The husbandO of the deceased died on December 11, 2007, and the O’s son was not the son of the deceased.

On April 18, 2007, he died.

The mother of the deceased is Q Q, the wife of P is the Appointor E, and P and E’s children are the Defendant (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Defendant”), the Appointor C and D.

The deceased’s property succeeded to 6/35 shares in Q 2/5, E by 9/35, Defendant, Appointor C, and D, respectively.

(4) Q andO obtained approval on the deceased on April 5, 2007 from the Incheon District Court 2007 Madan580, and the defendant and the designated parties (hereinafter “the defendant, etc.”) on March 27, 2008.