1. The District Court C and D (Dual) auction cases of real estate shall be drawn up on June 25, 2018 by the above court.

A. Although there is no absence, there is no dispute that G had withdrawn from the position of a party to the above contract and concluded a transfer contract between G and the Defendant.

* However, there is no evidence to know the contents of the initial transfer and acquisition contract and there is no evidence to know how the initial transfer and acquisition contract has been terminated or settled.

* According to the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the transfer and acquisition of the meat processing company (Evidence B No. 1), an agreement was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant with the content that the transfer and acquisition price shall be KRW 200 million, retirement allowance of KRW 400 million, and KRW 500 million in total, and KRW 1.1 billion in total, on December 1, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into the said transfer and acquisition agreement upon the deposit of the contract deposit to the Defendant, and on January 20, 2015, the down payment that was not paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant shall be invalidated and reverted to the Defendant, and the remainder shall be paid by February 28, 2015.

* After December 1, 2014, the Plaintiff paid KRW 200 million to the Defendant, KRW 300 million in the name of the Plaintiff on January 20, 2015, KRW 100 million in the name of the Plaintiff on January 21, 2015, and KRW 220 million in the name of the Plaintiff on March 6, 2015.

* On April 7, 2015, the Defendant agreed to transfer 39,728 shares of the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s meat processing company and to resign from the registration director office. The Plaintiff transferred all the shares of the said company to the actual Plaintiff, and became the representative director of the said company.

* On May 8, 2015, the former directors of the Defendant and the Labor Processing Company transferred all the management rights and shares to the Plaintiff, and promised not to exercise those rights because they do not have the rights and management rights of the Land Processing Company, and promised between the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the J to the effect that the obligations and obligations with respect to the Land Processing Company do not exist any longer.

* With respect to the apartment located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the Plaintiff and the maximum debt amount set on October 23, 2014, KRW 700,000,000.