logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.05.28 2013고단312
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Hegel car.

On November 27, 2012, the Defendant driven the above car on November 27, 2012, and led to the left turn to the left at the seat of the tombe village at the seat of the funeral at the time of the movement of the wife population.

A person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle in a manner that well sees the front left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant left the road by negligence while neglecting it, and caused more than six electric poles owned by the Korea Electric Power Corporation to shock the electric poles adjacent to the road, and caused more than six electric poles owned by the Korea Electric Power Corporation. While the electric poles exceeded, the Defendant shocked DNA car owned by C, the traffic signs owned by the wife population in port-si, E-owned signboards and cables owned by the LGpller.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, destroyed the amount of the electric power plant repair cost of KRW 38 million owned by the Korea Electric Power Corporation, equivalent to KRW 3,561,476, transportation signs repair cost of the victim C owned by the victim C, equivalent to KRW 3,801,160, and KRW 1550,000, and KRW 310,000,000,000,000 for the cable repair cost of the victim’s electric power plant owned by the Korea Electric Power Corporation, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written estimate;

1. Reporting damage;

1. Written estimate of traffic sign;

1. Written estimate of advertisement board;

1. Application of the written estimate for vehicle repair;

1. Relevant provisions of Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts; and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The part concerning the dismissal of prosecution under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendant’s summary of the facts charged is driving a car of Hegel.

arrow