Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 14, 2012, from around September 7, 2012 to around September 7, 2012, the Defendant, including a special-purpose area, operated a solid shop with simple buildings, toilets, etc. in the area of 745m2m2 square meters in the name of Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu, a general commercial district, equipped with structures, toilets, etc., and operated a solid shop dealing with solid water, such as wave, scrap iron,

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the restriction on the construction of specific use area by installing and operating a secondhand shop, which is a excreta and waste disposal facility in a general commercial area.

2. On May 22, 2012, the Defendant violated an order to take corrective measures against the same offense as indicated in paragraph (1) by the head of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, the head of the Si/Gun/Gu (the first order to reinstate an illegal building). Around July 10, 2012, the Defendant again received a corrective order for a violation of a limited-use area (the second order to reinstate an illegal building) (the second order to reinstate an illegal building) (the second order to reinstate an illegal building), but failed to comply with it, thereby violating

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written accusation;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Corrective orders against violations of restrictions on activities in each specific use area;

1. Confirmation of land use plan;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Subparagraph 4 of Article 141 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and Article 76 of the Act on the Planning and Utilization of National Land Planning and Utilization Act concerning criminal facts, Articles 142 and 133 (1) of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (a violation of an order to take measures), the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the punishment for the crime of this case is not less severe in light of the content of the crime of this case, but the punishment as set forth in the order shall be determined by taking into account the fact that the defendant has no previous convictions, the fact that the defendant has been reinstated, the degree of