1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. The lesser portion between the second and the fourth string of the judgment of the court of first instance that is dismissed or added is as follows:

In light of the following facts: “The Defendant is a party to the instant exchange contract, and the Plaintiff B is not a party to the instant exchange contract, but stated “A and one other party” in the column of the contractual party to the instant exchange contract (Evidence A A A-1-1); Plaintiff B was also present at the time of the conclusion of the instant exchange contract; Plaintiff B was actually operating the instant commercial building; and the Defendant appears to have been aware of it, the Plaintiff B may be recognized as a party to the instant exchange contract.

[] The 15th page of the second 15th judgment of the first instance court "the value of a D shopping mall" is "as to the value of a D shopping mall, including D and its internal riding machine."

The lower portion between the third and the second column of the judgment of the first instance is the fact that there is no dispute (based on recognition), each entry of Gap evidence 1 through 10, Eul evidence 9 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the witness F of the first instance trial, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

The fourth fourth written judgment of the court of first instance "each description of evidence Nos. 4, 5, 6, and 7 and some testimony of witness F" are "B 4 through 7, 10 through 13, H's testimony of witness of the court of first instance, and part of witness F's testimony of the court of first instance," and "F of witness of the court of first instance" of the fourth written judgment is "F of the court of first instance."

The following shall be added to the fourth 10th of the judgment of the first instance.

As alleged by the Defendant, the value of D commercial buildings at the time when the Plaintiffs entered into the instant exchange contract is KRW 750,000,000, respectively, and the value of the inside riding machine is KRW 100,000,000.