logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.18 2018나60504
부당이득금
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the claims extended and reduced in this court, shall be modified as follows:

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases. Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the 3rd to 11th has been completed by cutting down the following.

[1] When the Plaintiff received 121,813,510 won, 2,790 won, 22,585,300 won, and 22,585,300 won, while performing the second construction with the consent of a majority of equity right holders, while the Plaintiff received 1,351,420 won, 148,540 won, 230 won, 22,50 won, 300 won, 22,585,30 won, 300 won, 300 won, 400 won, 300 won, 400 won, 300 won, 460 won, 205, 300 won, 300 won, 460 won, 200 won, 209, 300 won, 400 won, 200 won, 300 won, 2017 through 2019.

【5) In addition, the Plaintiff from May 2017 to April 2019.

arrow