beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
The seized 50,000 won paper paper 11 (No. 1) shall be issued to the victim C.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"200 Highest 34"
1. From October 2019, the Defendant was engaged in food delivery service while serving as delivery employee of the “G” branch office of the Daejeon Daejeon World War D and E as the delivery agent for the victim’s F operation in Daejeon-gu D and E.
The Defendant, from October 2019 to October 25, 2019, used the Plaintiff’s market price of H 125cc, which is equivalent to the KRW 2.5 million, for delivery business, and was kept in custody for the victim. On January 15, 2020, the Defendant rejected the return without justifiable grounds even if the Defendant was demanded by the victim to return on several occasions until January 24, 2020.
As a result, the defendant embezzled the property of the victim who was under custody in the course of business.
2. Larceny;
A. On January 17, 2020, around 16:19, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim I: at the “K” bank operated by the victim I in Sejong J, the Defendant purchased precious metals from the victim; on the other hand, the Defendant she was able to take over a c,405,00 won in the market price of the victim’s possession, and stolen it with the victim’s negligence of surveillance.
B. On January 23, 2020, around 16:51, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B: (a) at the “M” bank of the victim B’s operation “M”; (b) purchased precious metals from the victim; and (c) subsequently, the Defendant stolen it with the victim’s supervision neglected, by taking out one gold scrap equivalent to KRW 4,80,000 from the victim’s own market price.
C. On January 29, 2020, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim C at the “O” bank of the victim’s operation in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, for the victim to purchase precious metals. On the other hand, the Defendant: (a) purchased precious metals from the victim; (b) 3,060,000 won of the market price owned by the victim; (c) obtained a c,140,000 gold sheet from one and another; and (d) obtained a c,140,000 won of the market price; and (c) neglected supervision by the victim.