1. The defendant's statement of claim against the plaintiffs on the money stated in the corresponding "amount of claim" and each of the above money in the annexed statement of claim.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A had a share of 14/294 square meters in E forest land, Plaintiff B had a share of 294 square meters in F forest land and 17851 square meters in G forest land, Plaintiff C had a share of 21/294 in the said F forest and G forest, and Plaintiff D had a share of 7/294 in the said F forest and G forest, respectively (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant land”). In short, Plaintiff B had a share of 7/294 in each of the said F forest and G forest (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant land”).

(2) On June 3, 2002, the Defendant approved and publicly notified the plan for national defense and military installation projects (hereinafter “instant relocation project”) to K to K in the notification of the Ministry of National Defense for the relocation of the Armed Forces H unit (I, hereinafter “I”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Defendant from the Plaintiffs to December 6, 2002 through January 14, 203, pursuant to the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Acquisition of Land for Public Use and the Compensation for Loss (repealed by Act No. 6656, Feb. 4, 2002).

On January 14, 2003, 14/294 shares in F Forest No. 294 shares in B B on December 2, 2002 on the date of the transfer of ownership of land owned by the owner; on December 13, 2002, shares in 14/294 shares in 14/294 square meters in 294 square meters in the above G Forest No. 17851 square meters in the above G Forest No. 17851 square meters in December 13, 2002; on December 13, 2002, shares in 14/294 shares in 17/294 shares in 294 square meters in the above G Forest No. 17854 square meters in the above G Forest No. 17851 square meters in December 6, 2002

B. According to the original plan for the relocation project of this case, 1.30,000 square meters of the land which can be constructed among 2.7,000 square meters of the land expropriated in this case plus 6.20,000 square meters of the site surrounding the land expropriated in this case, and 1.40,00 square meters of the remaining 11.40,00 square meters of the military facility site were purchased for military boundary and training grounds. However, after the I's plan was disclosed to the media, I was against the serious opposition of Li and Li and Li et al., the I was unable to carry out the said relocation project.2) Accordingly, L market, Li City representative, Li citizen representative, L citizen representative, the Director General of National Defense,