logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.23 2017고합49
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant 2017 Gohap 49 is a professor of the convergence content department at a new industry convergence university located in Seoul E University (hereinafter referred to as “F major”).

1. Having exercised a considerable influence on the basis of the friendship with the former President, known as a non-ray of the former President who interfered with his/her duties, based on his/her friendship with the former President;

I (the name at JJ on February 25, 2014) and his/her her her son’s son’s son K (the name at L on June 18, 2015) were admitted to the sports science department of F major health science universities (the new industry convergence universities on March 2016) and received a school inspector’s warning during the first semester of 2015 due to his/her failure to attend the course. From the end of August 2015 to the beginning of October 25, 2016, K did not change the F major health science university head from around August 1, 2014 to around October 25, 2016 to the new industry as the head of the university and college, even if he/she did not attend the college from March 1, 2016 to October 25, 2016.

At F around March 4, 2016, the Defendant demanded credits from the above M even if K does not attend the lecture from the above M, and requested credits to the effect that “H’s H’s her son K is a sports special person who is undergoing training and going to go out of the country, so he is aware of his academic results and convenience in attendance, and the Defendant is well asked for credits.

The phrase “,” etc. is heard several times, and around April 2016, the introduction of the above M to the same purpose from the I and K to the same effect as the Defendant’s F major laboratory.

The words, “,” etc. were read.

Accordingly, the Defendant, at F around June 2016, did not attend K in the special lecture of “N”, which is the subject of the first semester of 2016, when he was demoted as his online and offline, and did not apply for the offline weather examination, but he attended the offline special lecture and applied for the offline weather examination, thereby obtaining the prescribed score and giving normal results to the Defendant’s assistant O and P, as he did not attend the offline special lecture of the offline and obtained the prescribed score for the offline weather examination.

arrow