logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.11.02 2018가단73481
소유권이전등록
Text

1. The Defendants are, among the vehicles listed in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff, Defendant A with respect to 3/7 shares on March 5, 2018.

Reasons

On July 1, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into an entrustment management contract with the Plaintiff, a motor vehicle transport business entity, with respect to the motor vehicle listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant motor vehicle”), under which the Plaintiff registered in the name of the Plaintiff, who is a motor vehicle transport business entity, and entered into the entrustment management contract with the content that the said entrusted management expenses, etc. are borne by the network D (hereinafter “instant entrustment contract”).

The network D died on November 15, 2015.

At the time of the deceased D’s death, Defendant A, E, and F, the spouse of the deceased, were co-inheritors, but E and F reported the renunciation of inheritance to the Suwon District Court on November 30, 2015, and received the repair adjudication on April 7, 2016 (2015-Ma877), and Defendant B and C, the parents of Defendant A and the network D, were co-inheritors.

Defendant A filed a report on the qualified acceptance with the same court on December 2, 2015 and received the repair adjudication on April 7, 2016 (2015-Ma883), Defendant B, and C filed a report on the qualified acceptance with the same court on July 27, 2017, and received the adjudication on November 17, 2017.

(2017-Madan486). The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants on June 21, 2018 against Defendant A, “The instant complaint to the effect that the ownership transfer registration procedure based on the termination of the instant land entry contract,” was served on the Defendant A on March 5, 2018, Defendant B, and C, respectively.

[Based on the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 6 (including partial number of defenses; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the reason for a claim for the suspension of the purport of the entire pleadings between the owner of the vehicle and the motor vehicle transport business operator, the owner of the vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the "land owner") entrusted the name of the motor vehicle under his/her ownership to the motor vehicle transport business operator (hereinafter referred to as the "branch") and vests his/her ownership and the right to manage the vehicle in his/her possession in the company where the ownership and the right to manage the vehicle belongs to the vehicle. However, in the case of entering into a "motor vehicle management contract" with the purport that the vehicle owner will pay a certain amount of management expenses to the designated company in his/her own account upon entrustment of the right to manage the vehicle.

arrow