1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties or may be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 11, Eul evidence 12-1 through 3, Eul evidence 1-6, Eul evidence 7-1 through 4, Eul evidence 8-1 to 9-3, Eul evidence 9-1 to 10, Eul evidence 14, Eul evidence 15, Eul evidence 16-1, 2, Eul evidence 17, Eul evidence 20, and Eul evidence 20.

The summary of the housing site development project is that approximately KRW 9,307,148 square meters of the land located in Sung-si, Sung-si, Sung-si are designated and publicly announced as the housing site development area on December 26, 2001. The Korea National Housing Corporation, the Korea Land Corporation, the Sung-nam City, and the Gyeonggi-do shall be the project district in which the said housing site development area is the project district (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”).

(2) After approval of the housing site development plan for the project in this case on December 30, 2003 and approval of the housing site development implementation plan on December 30, 2004, on May 18, 2005, approval of the housing site development plan was made on May 23, 2005 on the basis of the area of the site for the project and estimated development cost determined by approval of the housing site development plan and the implementation plan modification plan on December 30, 204.

After several times the housing site development plan has been revised, but the area of the project and the details of the project have been revised, but the frame has been generally maintained.

3) Meanwhile, the Korea National Housing Corporation was merged with the Korea Land Corporation on October 1, 2009 (hereinafter “Korea Land Corporation or the Korea National Housing Corporation”) and became the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant”) on October 1, 2009.

B. B. The Defendant’s housing site supply process 1) D, E, and F resided in the instant project district. The Defendant, as incorporated into the instant project district and decided to specially sell the instant housing site to be developed within the project district due to the implementation of the instant project, as part of the relocation measures against the original residents who lost their means of livelihood due to expropriation of housing or land, etc., and announced the compensation plan on September 29, 2003.