beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification or addition of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the
2. On the second page 9-12 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the amendment or addition to the amendment or addition is as follows.
A. The defendant (the person in charge of the National Armed Forces) is the National Armed Forces Construction Co., Ltd. on November 12, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the "Construction of National Naboxes").
) On the 1,603,508,00 won for the total construction cost of the 200 Formula 1 (360,123,890 won in the year 2013, 1,243,384,110 won in the year 2014), and the construction period from November 12, 2013 to June 30, 2014 (hereinafter “original contract”).
7)No. 10 of the first instance judgment of "A." added the following judgments:
As seen above, the Plaintiff’s assertion is reasonable in this regard, since it was recognized that Boh general construction without giving the Plaintiff a payment guarantee certificate for the subcontract price of this case through discussion, which is the supervisor responsible for the Defendant. In light of the Plaintiff’s receipt of KRW 70,000,00 from Boh general construction, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case violates the good faith or the good faith and the good faith and the good faith and the good faith, but in this case, even though the agreement on the direct payment of the subcontract price of this case was established between the Defendant and Boh general construction and the Plaintiff on the direct payment of the subcontract price of this case, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case does not violate the good faith and the good faith and the good faith and the good faith and the good faith.
7 The Plaintiff’s assertion that direct payment of the subcontract price of this case is made.