1. The Defendant’s KRW 81,619,664 to the Plaintiff, as well as KRW 6% per annum from October 17, 2018 to November 15, 2018.

1. From May 2018 to October 16, 2018, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with goods equivalent to KRW 136,743,130 from May 2018 to October 16, 2018. Of them, there is no dispute between the parties that the amount of goods equivalent to KRW 81,619,664 remains.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 81,619,664 as the price for the goods, and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 6% per annum prescribed by the Commercial Act from October 17, 2018 to November 15, 2018, which is clear that it is the last delivery date for the Defendant and the co-defendants of the instant payment order from October 17, 2018, and 12% per annum prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment.

2. The defendant's argument regarding the defendant's assertion is not directly supplied by the defendant, but falsely supplied goods to the defendant's company at a different site of C, other than the defendant's site, since the defendant's remaining goods price is presumed to have been supplied with goods in the defendant's name by falsity. Thus, although the defendant is not obligated to pay the above goods price, there is no evidence to acknowledge it, the above argument by the

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.