logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.05.15 2018가단1013
승계집행문부여에 대한 이의
Text

1. As to the claim for the acquisition amount between the non-party D and the defendant in Gwangju District Court 2010 Ghana19680, the above court.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts.

3. Where a qualified acceptance report is accepted after the grant of the partial dismissed part of the execution clause, an inheritor may file a lawsuit of demurrer against the grant of the execution clause with respect to the non-permission of the compulsory execution of the property other than the scope of the inherited property, and may not seek revocation of the succession execution clause itself or the non-permission of the compulsory execution itself based on the relevant execution title.

However, as in the case of this case, the claim by the plaintiffs who are inheritors who made a qualified acceptance shall be deemed to include the purport of demanding the denial of compulsory execution against property beyond the scope of inherited property among compulsory execution based on the inherited execution clause. Thus, within such limit, the plaintiffs' claims are justified, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow