The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

The application for compensation of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who had livedd with the victim C from January 2015 at the place of residence of the victim of Ulsan-gu D, Ulsan-gu.

around 05:40 on March 16, 2015, the Defendant stated that “the victim’s vehicle fee (time to work) is changed” to the victim’s residence, and reported that the victim, who was in custody of ordinary cash, held a head of the sexual harassment and taken 10,000 won in the vehicle. The Defendant shall take one million won where the victim, in diving, crebs the toilet between the head of the U.S. and the head of the U.S., where the victim was in custody of ordinary cash.

In other words, they stolen them.

2. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, the witness C’s legal statement, C’s statement in the prosecutor’s office and the police interrogation protocol, and C’s statement are written.

C was stolen by 110,000 won in cash (30,000 won in each white bag, 400,000 won in each white bag, 100,000 won in each KRW, 80,000 won in only KRW, 70 per day in each written statement immediately after the theft was reported.)

However, on June 27, 2015, the prosecution stolen KRW 10,100,000,000 in total, including two bags with KRW 600,000,000, and two bags with KRW 400,000,00, and 5,000,000,000 in cremation.

On the same day, the statement made by the Defendant on a stolen amount and the number of bags containing money was changed, and at the prosecution, the Defendant collected subsidies from the State for livelihood benefits to which the Defendant received KRW 4.90,000 per month from the State. However, in this court, it is difficult to believe C’s each statement because the statement continued to change due to the following reasons: (a) he/she made a new tour after marriage, and (b) 400,000 won was stated as his/her mother’s money.

In addition, at the time of giving up the difference to the defendant, Korea shall not take part in the United States in which it has kept the money.

Although it was argued that the defendant was aware of the fact that he had money in his homeland, it is difficult to find out that there was money between C's reasoning and the satisfaction of his own.