A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2014 Highest 2345" is a person who actually operates C Co., Ltd. in Busan Shipping Daegu.

On July 2014, in the vicinity of ideas and ideas located in the city of Busan, the Defendant called "(38 years of age) the victim D (the company operating within the city is operating the industrial complex development project in the new city of the articles of incorporation, and the company will sell the development recompense land remaining in this project at the low price. Our company's shares are 10,000 won, but the current market price is 30,000 won, and there is a reasonable possibility that the price will be 10,000 won to 30,000 won to 10,000 won to 30,000 won to 10,000 won to 10,000 won to 38,000 won to her part of shares.

B. Although the name of the shares or the name of the representative of the company in the name of a bad credit holder is not located in the name of the shares or the shares in the company, the shares are held in the name of the borrowed name and the name of the borrowed name shares purchased in KRW 30,00 per share three months prior to the occurrence of the three-month period. However, the four-month name stated that the four-month name "the name of the two persons and the number of shares is required to change the certificate and the seal impression" and received the certificate and the seal impression from the victim.

On July 15, 2014, the Defendant again called that “The Defendant would return 900 million won of the shares of the company to the victim again within a week from the transfer of the said shares to the victim,” which read, “The Defendant would return the actual amount of the share purchase price of KRW 90 million to the Plaintiff within the week from the transfer of the shares to the Plaintiff, even if the amount of the shares transferred on the document by a certified tax accountant is possible, in order to save taxes.”

However, around January 2014, the Defendant prepared a written contract to purchase the said company’s shares from E, and the Defendant did not pay the price so that it could not change the said shares in the name of the victim, and was thought to use the money received from the victim for the purpose of the said company’s employees’ benefits and operating funds. The said company was the company.