beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and for a defendant B, for a period of three years and six months, respectively.
Each request of the applicant for compensation.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants were married, and Defendant B served as an insurance designer from May 29, 1985 to June 2009 at the I business group J branch of the I business group Co., Ltd.
1. On February 16, 2008, Defendant A and B made a false statement to the effect that “M” was “M” at the victim L operated by the victim in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul, with the victim’s “M” land operated by the victim in Seocho-gu Seoul, and would have repaid the balance to the victim within one month if the balance is short of money.”
However, in fact, the Defendants made an investment in the leased real estate and failed to pay the insurance solicitation allowance, and the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to pay the insurance premium even if they paid the insurance premium collected by the Defendants in lieu of the insured in 2006 to 5-600 million won.
In collusion, the Defendants: (a) by deceiving the victims and receiving KRW 10 million from July 16, 2007 to April 8, 2009; and (b) by deceiving the victims as shown in the annexed crime list 1; and (c) obtained a total of KRW 191,00,000 from three victims on nine occasions; and (d) by deceiving them.
2. On November 17, 2006, Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that “I will pay 8% interest per annum if I lend money to the Defendant F, who is the wife, at the Defendant’s house located in Yongsan-gu Seoul N apartment 209 Dong 1704, the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government N apartment 209 Dong 1704.”
However, in fact, Defendant A had already been liable for personal debts of 5-600 million won around 2006, such as investment in real estate leased by the bonds, and even if Defendant A borrowed money from the victim with all of 200 million won borrowed from the victim due to bond repayment and living expenses around 2005, there was no intention or ability to repay the money.
Defendant
A, as such, deceiving the victim F, thereby deceiving it.