Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Criminal facts

On February 15, 2020, at around 08:15, the Defendant was unable to operate the said patrol vehicle for about 15 minutes, on the ground that D, a police officer of the Seoul Mine Police Station, who was called up after receiving a report of 112 that “the taxi driver shall not provide guidance on the taxi fee”, demanded D to pay the taxi fee to the Defendant and return home, on the ground that D, a police officer of the Seoul Mine Police Station, who was called up, demanded the Defendant to stop the front of the patrol vehicle and stop the chief door of the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers' patrol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (field polyscopic image analysis);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. 가납명령 형사소송법 제334조 제1항 양형의 이유 ◎ 불리한 정상 ; 약 15분간 순찰차를 운행하지 못하게 함으로써 경찰관들의 직무집행을 방해한 점 등 ◎ 유리한 정상 ; 종전에 벌금형보다 더 무거운 형으로 처벌받은 범죄전력이 없는 점, 경찰관들이 현장을 떠나지 못하도록 순찰차 앞을 가로막거나 순찰차 조수석 문을 닫지 못하게 하는 정도의 유형력을 행사했을 뿐, 경찰관들의 신체에 직접 유형력을 행사하거나 경찰관들을 협박하지는 않은 점(욕설도 하지 않았다), 잘못을 뉘우치며 반성하고 있는 점 등 ◎ 그 외에 피고인의 연령, 성행, 환경, 범행 전후의 정황 등 이 사건 재판과정에 나타난 여러 양형의 조건을 종합하여 주문과 같이 형을 정한다.